Light, Round or Square Source Beauty Dish or Soft Box?

Soft boxes came out with the idea being to reproduce a diffuse window light. The original light boxes in fact were hard shells with multiple lamps inside. Heavy, hard to move around and always used at a distance relatively far from the subject made for a convenient way to make a soft light for portraiture , and or fashion with use of speed lights.

With video becoming more popular and portable, the need for soft light weight rib mounted sewn fabric single source lightweight soft boxes ( rectangular and square) became the norm. The popular brands of the day were Photoflex, Chimera, and Plume.
The question that comes up often in forums is soft box or beauty dish?

The question should really be round or square?
Let’s look at what the differences are.
The diffuser,: it is placed between the light coming from the interior surfaces of the shell or reflector. Many have silver inserts, some have white added or painted white. Plume were the first to have interior baffles with a concentrated diffusion in the centre for even distribution towards the corners in the case of soft boxes.
Both soft boxes and beauty dishes are made to push the light in directions making use of the shape of the reflector. The light then is not only going forward from the flash if there is no baffle, but also at various angles with large amounts of scatter from the parabolic nature of the reflectors. An efficient reflector will be one that directs the light forward and the largest proportion of the light coming off the reflector is directed in an even but similar direction as the source. This is one reason why a true flash has a very different light quality than a small hot shoe flash inside a soft box or beauty dish.

When the light strikes the diffuser surface it will be reduced in intensity as well as redirect some of the light radiating outwards from the translucent fabric (or surface) to some degree. This redirection will have little consequence if not in very close proximity.
When the light source is large, and close relative to the subject this is what makes the shadow transitions gradual. It is the size of the source and distance to subject that appear soft as the transitions are gradual. Some confuse this with lower contrast which it is not. In fact the light if very close will be quite bright on the close side and possibly relatively dark in the shadows even though the transition is subtle between the two.
The effect of the size of the light relatively large compared to the subject is termed wrap or light wrapping. The speed at which the change happens is exactly what you want to watch for if you have modelling lights that represent the flash. The difference of only a few inches makes a huge difference. There is a point at which the light is too large, the skin texture is too filled thus lacks life. Moving the light back a few inches or turning it away can reveal the missing texture, and have more defined specular highlights.

The further you move the light away the less wrap you will have, as it’s size relation will become equal, and the light will fill less due to the collimation of the light.

Back to the question of round or rectangular diffusors.

When you are in close proximity, the geometry of the surface becomes the crucial factor when the light is used on beauty and portraits.
Since you know the diffusion effect of the surface is only significant when in very close range of the subject and the size is larger than the subject , the direction combined with the edge effect is what will determine the graduation of light and the shadow transitions.
While it is not obvious at first, think about the distance from a round source compared to a rectangular soft box. The nose shadows if front lit with a round source are equidistant. Square and rectangular lights have a variable that causes double shadows around the nose under the same light direction. Rectangular lights can be used from oblique angles where the distance will make the shadow shapes more or less equal, yet front or normal beauty light will almost always be questionable due to cross shadows.

There you have it, round for front or beauty lighting, rectangular for oblique side lighting or very high with some distance to subject.

Posted in Lighting, Photography, Tutorials | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Neil Snape’s Area 35 Expo still running, the March 2nd opening a grand success.

After having quickly rounded up the frames, put them together without breaking too many, driving them across France through the Mont Blanc tunnel, all arrived well for the expo.
Giacomo and Sara readied the gallery with a fresh coat of paint, making the immense gallery immaculate. It seemed a shame to punch holes in this clean canvas but together we quickly mounted the entire show in an afternoon.

The last minute details were aided by everyone, a special thanks to Giacomo’s parents.

Back just in time for the first guests, everything was perfect, including the table set up with our two hostesses who managed the entire gathering well into the night.

As people were coming and going, I spoke with many, each one having a reason why I’d love to have spoken with much longer.

At one point someone said they believed that the make up was the harder part of my pictures which made me laugh away my stage fright !

It is quite something to host a show of this size. I’m deeply grateful to Sara, Giacomo, and our friend Sophie for insisting to have the show.

Sharing photography is usually done in a singular way, it is only when you have an expo , and the opening where it is a celebration of art, by and with people as creative as the works themselves.

Thanks to all for a successful , memorable show.

Below some snapshots by Natsuki Oneyama,

Posted in Photography | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Neil Snape, présente « Powder and Paint » sa 1ère exposition personnelle à Milan. (French version)

Area 35

L’artiste présente « Powder and Paint » sa 1ère exposition personnelle à Milan.
Neil Snape est un photographe de beauté et de nature morte. Il est né au Canada mais il vit et travaille à Paris. Depuis 20 ans il travaille et collabore avec certains des plus grands magazines de mode comme Jalouse, Marie Claire, Marie France, Madame Figaro, Le Monde d’Hermès, Vogue Hommes International et d’autres.
Depuis ses débuts parisiens Neil Snape a développé un style nouveau de photographie qui lui a valu d’obtenir des commandes dans la publicité avec Cartier, Sonia Rykiel, Helena Rubenstein, l’Oréal, Hennessy etc.
Après la Nature Morte, la Beauté est venue naturellement, ce qui lui a permis d’accéder des sommets de la technicité au monde sensuel des cosmétiques et des produits de beauté.
Ses images sont envahies par le charme des couleurs qui embrassent les tons des plus intenses et vifs aux nuances voilées des plus sensuelles, caractéristiques d’une recherche qui ne se limite pas à la palette habituelle des clichés de mode.
Sa recherche obsessionnelle de la perfection du détail de composition et l’utilisation magistrale de la lumière sont la signature de ses images.
Une exposition pour l’art l’a amené ces deux dernières années à la photographie du close up et du make up par passion pour la création d’images captivantes.
Tout comme la technologie qui atteint aujourd’hui le faîte de la créativité dans chaque aspect existant de la production, Neil Snape atteint la perfection dans tous les aspects de la production d’images.

Area 35
Galleria d’Arte Contemporanea
Via Vigevano 35, Milano 20100
Contact:
Sung Hee Bramani Araldi 348 4450125
Giacomo Marco Valerio 339 3916899

Posted in Photography | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Neil Snape, exposition Powder and Paint is about to happen in Milan the 2nd of March (English version)

Canadian born , Neil Snape is a beauty and still life photographer, living for the past 20 years in Paris. After starting out in his first studio in Vancouver, the sheer attraction of magazines at the time like Vogue Italia, Paris Vogue, etc, resulted in moving to Paris in 1991. Over the past two decades his images have run in many of the leading fashion publications such as Jalouse, Marie Claire, Marie France, Madame Figaro, Monde d’Hermes, Vogue Hommes International, and many more.
From the beginning in Paris , Neil found new styles in photography so unique they spurred on commands for advertising, and editorial alike. Recent advertising clients include Cartier, Helena Rubesntein, Hennessy, L’Oreal, Sonia Rykiel , and other important brands.
Transitioning from stills to beauty was an ultimate goal porting the highest level of technical to the sensual world of cosmetics/beauty products. Fascination with colour lead to exploration of both colour palettes playing with harmonies not often used in mainstream commercial work. Detail and volume are a signature mark of his work.
In the last two years he has consecrated most of his personal work to make up close ups entirely for the passion of creating striking imagery. As technologies have advanced to the point where creativity exists in all aspects of the production, Neil has pursued perfection in every area of image making.

Area 35
Galleria d’Arte Contemporanea
Via Vigevano 35, Milano 20100
Contact:
Sung Hee Bramani Araldi 348 4450125
Giacomo Marco Valerio 339 3916899

Posted in Photography | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Neil Snape, expo Powder and Paint is about to happen in Milan the 2nd of March (Italian version)

Area 35, il Nautilus del nuovo sentire dell’uomo contemporaneo, esplora arte, pittura , scultura ma anche design ed architettura, indagandone e testimoniando il continuo cambiamento del pensiero creativo.
Area 35, in via Vigevano 35 in un caratteristico cortile dei vecchi navigli.
Area 35 e Neil Snape, fotografo canadese.
Lʼ artista presenta “Powder and Paint” sua prima mostra personale a Milano.
Neil Snape è un fotografo beauty e still life, canadese di nascita vive e lavora a Parigi.
Da vent’anni lavora e collabora con alcune delle più grandi firme delle pubblicazioni di moda come Jalouse, Marie Claire, Marie France, Madame Figaro, Monde d’Hermes, Vogue Hommes International e molti altri.
Dagli esordi parigini, Neil ha sviluppato uno stile nuovo di fotografia che gli ha avvalso importanti commissioni nel campo del’ advertising con Cartier, Helena Rubenstein, Hennessy, l’ Oreal, Sonia Rykoel e altre importanti firme.
Dagli scatti still life a quelli beauty è questo il traguardo finale che ha permesso a Neil di accedere dalle vette della capacità tecnica al sensuale mondo dei cosmetici e dei prodotti di bellezza. Gli scatti di Neil Snape sono pervasi dal fascino di colori che spaziano dalle tinte più intense e vivaci fino alle più sensuali e velate nuances caratteristiche di una ricerca che non si limita alle normali palette di colori degli scatti di moda.
La ricerca maniacale della perfezione del dettaglio compositivo e dell’utilizzo magistrale della luce sono la firma di ogni suo lavoro.
Area 35 ha voluto essere rappresentata da Neil Snape con “Powder and Paint” per la terza mostra al pubblico. Una mostra per l’arte del fotografo canadese che ha portato negli ultimi due anni la fotografia del close up e del make up fino a livelli eccelsi nella creazione di immagini di bellezza straordinaria. Come la tecnologia oggi raggiunge un apice dove la creatività esiste in ogni aspetto della produzione, Neil Snape raggiunge la perfezione in tutte le aree della produzione dell’immagine.
Area 35
Galleria d’Arte Contemporanea
Via Vigevano 35, Milano 20100
Contatti
Sung Hee Bramani Araldi 348 4450125
Giacomo Marco Valerio 339 3916899

Posted in Photography | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Website Creation by Neil Snape

Although photography is light of my life, recently I’ve been helping clients make and remake their web sites.

On and off since Netscape 3, I’ve been doing my own with arcane applications by using drag and drop grids , or in html terms, tables.

If only we could see how fast web site code, html specs, and display models would reveal themselves for the better or worse.

Now, with html being almost entirely drawn to browsers by the DOM , driven by css, simple sites are much more logical than before.

While Flash sites came on strong about 5 years ago, the advantages will be stripped away when html 5 comes on strong. Flash has it’s place as a design application for UIs and independent apps, yet as a web browser display technology , it is not ideal.

Interactivity is still strong in Javascript, although many easier to use Frameworks have added an easier to implement code, that is linked to excellent built in scripting called a Framework. Yahoo UI was one of the first, then MooTools and JQuery became popular for today’s webmasters.

Integration though has not become easier, much harder in fact than ever. I hold my hat low to those who delve into PHP, ASPx, Oracle, and other database driven sites that fill page requests. Those too ,who code AJAX with the database are magicians that have earned respect, and rightly so.

Thankfully, WordPress ( this blog of course) runs on a lot of the above, is easy to install and maintain.

Ah yes, I suppose I’m hooked again on technology.

I had fun and frustration making these sites:

my site

a site about words meeting internet by translation

my friend’s grand project to bring a moment of happiness in stationery

a photography site by an excellent art director

If you would like to collaborate on making your site, let me know.

Posted in Technologies and reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

iPad, iPhone & other mobile devices alternate css.

iPad , iPhone & other mobile devices alternate css.

The speed at which the evolution to multi device sites are needed is already long past a reasonable rate at which people can re-work their sites to conform with the new interfaces.

When web designers went from table based layout to css layout about 6 years ago the only real concern was browser compatibility (namely IE).
Then to add animation, and browser interoperability, JavaScript, and CMS queries fast became the norm as well as AJAX combining all three together.

Who ever thought the mobile telephone market would become part of the browsing world?
Most people like me with limited html and css knowledge let alone JavaScript, making your current site look good or work at all on iPhones, iPads, and the Touch was a problematic question with few solid answers.
This brings me to why I’m writing this.
When I reworked my site I stripped out all Flash swfs knowing they were taboo according to Steve Jobs.
That I would have hoped was all that was needed.
Wrong.

Although as good as it is, Safari uses something called web-kit to transform your html pages into something that fits into your screen and uses touch screen events rather than a mouse.

In my ignorance, I used iFrames or just a regular table with scrollable overflow to display images.
Simple and easy to use html, works on all browsers, no JS needed,
What I didn’t know was iFrames and all “divs” are not really scrollable with one finger, as one finger on the touch screen listens for an entire screen slide. If you have a frame or div with a specific width, it can’t scroll like that.

You can scroll with two fingers however, a bit jumpy but does work. So few people know this , so you would have an unusable site at most.

The search for a scrollable div on Google was not at all conclusive. There is a person who came up with a JS script for absolute positioned divs but not only complicated, it requires the divs to be the full width of the container, not a “window” as I wanted to use for image scrolling.

Further research showed that device detection scripts and queries would work. It seems that many large sites do exactly this. IF a mobile device is detected, the browser request for the pages is transferred to a device specific page (s).
The harder part is that if I understood right, the detection script works with a server sided CMS query, so for your normal html simple site, you’d better know JavaScript and PhP well.

I didn’t want to re-write my site into PhP just for a scrollable div on a static page.

Finally I found a simple solution on the Apple developer’s site, iPhone specific recommendations.
In the head of your html documents, you insert a meta tag that specifies a specific screen size and or orientation. What it does , is the browser parses the css, and if the conditions are met in the meta tags, then that specific css is used. It can be a linked external file or inline. In theory inline would have a higher specificity but it seems to work fine in an external style sheets.
In my case I when an iPhone or iPad falls into the right conditions set in the tags, the special css is used and the normal full size browsers ignored
By changing the overflow of the divs on the image pages, I changed scrollable to overflow : visible

I also added specific Meta tags for the iPad as it has a different resolution so it needs it’s own met tag.
When changing the css for the iPad you can even add yet another line to specify orientation, a nice way to move divs around orientation dependent.

I am pasting some code in here but you can always view any page’s source code in the browsers. Firefox has an plug in called Firebug that shows you everything in a site including the scripting and DOM.

targeting css device specific

different css rules for devices

iPad detect

Apple Developer site for iPhone iPad

The code below does this:

  • sets the original size of the screen view to 100%.
  • detects iPad resolution
  • detects iPhone resolution
  • 
    
    Posted in Technologies and reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

    Palm Springs Portfolio Reviews at PhotoPlus Expo 2010

    PhotoPlus Expo October 27-30th New York

    Throughout a life long journey artists will eventually ask themselves if they would make it in New York.

    Like crooner Frank Sinatra sung:

    Start spreadin’ the news, I’m leaving today
    I want to be a part of it: New York, New York.
    If I can make it there, I’ll make it anywhere,
    It’s up to you, New York, New York.”

    The thought crossed my mind many times, yet there were always reasons justifying not trying my hand.

    With changes in the market, the moroseness of the Paris market in particular, had me seriously thinking of looking elsewhere for work.

    Discovering markets outside where you live can be a challenging experience to arrive at an efficient schedule. Getting to see everyone in one trip is not going to happen and even contacting the people is a dauntingly difficult task.

    Being a faithful reader of PDN (Photo District News) since starting out in photography, I read the posting for a competition for all photographers with the categories I would fit into. Even more interesting, was the list of jury members; Jed Root, Hali Tara Friehling Details magazine, Mazdack Rass from the Milk Group, Nadine McCarth Allure Magazine, Vince Aletti adjunct curator, Year of Fashion ICP & curator, 
2010 New York Photo Festival, Steven Torres Style.com, Mathew Jordan Smith (great photographer), and Jennifer Kim Teen Vogue. These are exactly the people I would want to show my book to if ever in NY, so I sent my pictures up on-line so they’d see them.

    Delightfully surprised, not only were my pictures put in front of the people listed above, but they chose me as best, and winner in the “beauty” category!

    This prompted me to follow up on this excellent opportunity. Combining a trip with the infamous gathering at the PDN PhotoPlus Expo and seeing some people in NY was the ideal occasion. Upon further research on of the big new features was the Palm Springs Portfolio Reviews held at the show.  Looking at the past reviews on http://connect.palmspringsphotofestival.com/ I had a good idea that this was the perfect mix of reviewers to answer all my questions, all in the same place and same time.

    This was the first time I had experienced anything like it. The origination must be colossal for such an event, but the entire staff did a tremendous job. There were only pleasurable exchanges, which is extraordinary considering the stakes and pressure of making it happen. The participants awaited patiently their timed reviews while having some moments to talk to one another while waiting. Many organized 10 reviews, thus were there for two or even three days. We were just as curious to know why we were there as to what we had to show.

    Here are some points about the reviews, reviewers, and what a portfolio review could do for you.

    Do the reviewers really look at your pictures?

    Most do, some don’t look very long. The good news is for those who continued talking while turning the pages and looking at me rather than the images, they come back and flip through again at least once. This could be because the reviewers may be in the habit of looking at books alone or with an agent, not with the photographer.

    Try to pick up clues on which pictures stop them, which ones delight them, which ones put them off. The flow, and feeling is quickly picked up if good, and quietly dismissed if not. When the presentation is finished and the reviewer reader to answer your questions, go back to the ones that they liked. Ask why these were the ones that stopped them, and why the ones that put them off did. The rest of the book is filler that has to be checked continuously for justifying it’s volume compared to the great, good, and bad ones.

    What do reviewers’ comments really mean?

    You have to know that each reviewer will have their own view relative to their experience and their respective domains of expertise. How ever close the target reviewers are , they may offer opinions that are valid for what they do , not necessarily what you want to do. The closer your goals towards the reviewer’s field of expertise, the further it raises the validity of the comments, and value of the comments. The comments will be directed by the very questions you pose, and the quality of the questions of course. If you don’t ask anything, then the reviewer is only going to critic your portfolio thus you will miss the chance to expound on the potential of your work.

    Many comments will be relative to the scenario if you were to ask the reviewer for work what they expect you to have to do so, even if you didn’t expressly ask. These days keeping all options open is a good policy. This is invaluable advice for all, and if taken seriously, you are opening doors and fast. As visual artists we often forget one powerful tool that is the mighty pen. If you note some of the important comments made by the reviewer, they will likely write down a few themselves. So much is said so fast, yet the few notes you write down will be the ones you remember.

    Are the reviews long enough?

    You’d be best to reduce the number of pieces or pages shown to a minimum. If the presentation is short, to the point, then the rest of the time is the most precious time you could ever have with a expert in person face to face. The reviews are in as much a chance to talk about directions, news, feeling out the industry as much as your actual book.  If you do well the book can always be sent to the reviewer at another time, yet your face time with that person is an opportunity to start a relationship beyond what just another book can be.

    What can I take home from a portfolio review?

    You’ll be armed with a bevy of tips, new directions, leads, a new energized feeling. After all it’s a moment of many feelings, many personalities, thoughts and expressions. Although it is possible it is unlikely that you will be signing with an agent, have a gallery expo, get an assignment on the spot. All those things are built upon the relationships you may create starting with these reviews. Exchange business cards, offer a leave behind, a bribe, cookies, seriously listen for ways to follow up.

    Chrysler Building NYC

    NYC

     

    Robert Bacall of Bacall reps, ” What are you doing right now for promotion, blogs?, leBook?, mailers?, Skype?”

    Posted in Photography, Technologies and reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments